The New York Times’ Kashmir Hill recently profiled Clearview, whose technology matches facial-recognition scans with images of the same person scraped from social media. The company says that it has a database of more that 3 billion facial images scraped from social sites, including Facebook and YouTube. It claims that 600 federal and state law enforcement agencies are now using its product.
Clearview AI was likely the trigger for the letter to the Department of Homeland Security’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board from the Electronic Privacy Information Center and 40 other privacy groups, calling for a ban on further implementation of facial-recognition technologies funded by the government.
The letter recommends “the suspension of facial recognition systems, pending further review,” saying U.S. citizens shouldn’t be subject to facial recognition surveillance in the course of their daily lives when they’ve done nothing wrong. The privacy groups also point to studies showing that facial recognition often misidentifies people of color in higher percentages. Several cities, including San Francisco, Somerville, Massachusetts, and Oakland, California, have already barred police from using facial-recognition technology.
There’s no safe way for governments to use facial recognition for surveillance purposes.”
The Clearview app may have set off alarm bells because of its broadness of scope. The app can scan the face of anybody in public and match it against a huge database of images scraped from the web.
But most law enforcement agencies use facial recognition tech in a more focused way than Clearview AI’s offering, says Jon Gacek, the head of government, legal and compliance for Veritone, which provides recognition technology to law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and Europe.
“I think what Clearview did was overreach,” he said. “Certainly that’s a capability. Minority Report is possible, but it’s not a pragmatic use of the technology.”
Gacek says that Veritone’s Identify app uses facial-recognition AI to detect only specific criminal events captured by security or surveillance cameras, and matches the important faces in them with faces contained in smaller “known suspect” databases. “It’s just using technology to do what police already do, except far faster and at less cost,” he says.
Gacek also points out that the larger the database of images the AI searches for matches, the greater the risk of the system returning false positives.
Amazon Web Services and Microsoft’s Azure both provide services that can identify faces as faces, and match them in a database with faces published online, either in ads or social media. For instance, a law enforcement tool called Thorn uses Amazon’s Rekognition to scan the internet for images of children who have been sold into sex trafficking. But these tech giants don’t offer products that essentially capture a face in public and run a search through the internet for the same face, as Clearview AI does.
Amazon chose not to comment directly on Clearview AI or EPIC’s letter, but a spokeswoman told me that if Amazon sees any of its clients using its facial recognition services in ways that are harmful to people, it will investigate.
“We know that facial recognition technology, when used irresponsibly, has risks,” Amazon’s general manager of AWS AI, Dr. Matt Wood, wrote in a blog post. “This is true of a lot of technologies, computers included. And, people are concerned about this. We are, too. It’s why we suspend people’s use of our services if we find they’re using them irresponsibly or to infringe on people’s civil rights.”
The political angle
Basing policy decisions on an extreme case like Clearview AI may be a recipe for regulatory overreach. In fact, the privacy organizations’ choice of an extreme case like Clearview AI as the basis of their sweeping complaint looks a bit political. Not only does the company’s technology sound scary, but the company is backed Donald Trump ally Peter Thiel, and one of the company’s cofounders, Richard Schwartz, was a staffer for Rudy Giuliani when he was mayor of New York.
“This isn’t new; I saw a demo of this app last year,” says Garrett Johnson of the Lincoln Network, a conservative tech advocacy group in Washington, D.C. “They’re associated with Peter Thiel, so they provide a good bogeyman.”
Johnson argues that the government shouldn’t move too quickly to restrict emerging technologies. “Ultimately there is a responsibility on both sides,” he says. “The government shouldn’t preemptively kill innovation with heavy-handed regulations when we’re still not quite sure what the downside is–and we should be looking very closely at the downsides–or what the upside is going to be.”
“There’s also a responsibility on the tech side to be transparent about the innovations they’re building, and to communicate those more effectively to the government,” he adds.
On the other side of the debate some believe that facial recognition tech is irredeemable, that its benefits can never rise above its dangers.
“There’s no safe way for governments to use facial recognition for surveillance purposes,” said Evan Greer of Fight for the Future in an email to Fast Company. “That’s why there’s growing consensus that governments and law enforcement agencies should be banned outright from using this technology,”
“There should also be strict limits on corporate and private use of this technology, and it should not be allowed in public spaces or institutions like colleges, hotels, or airports,” Greer wrote.
We are helping Apple all of the time on TRADE and so many other issues, and yet they refuse to unlock phones used by killers, drug dealers and other violent criminal elements. They will have to step up to the plate and help our great Country, NOW! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 14, 2020
It seems unlikely that the White House would move quickly toward a facial recognition ban, if at all. The Trump administration rarely strays from its pro-business, hands-off regulatory approach. It also wouldn’t care for the optics of tying the hands of law enforcement to detect and ID criminals. The same stance has less to the administration backing the Justice Department’s efforts to pressure technology companies such as Apple to build encryption “backdoors” into their devices so that law enforcement can access the contents.
Johnson says that he believes there’s little chance of any major technology regulation passing in 2020. But I find it’s possible that some form of AI regulation may occur next year, depending on the results of the election.
Suspect Who Shot 2 Louisville Cops During Breonna Taylor Protests Identified
Officials with the Louisville Metro Cops Division have actually recognized the man captive that they say shot and injured 2 law enforcement officers Wednesday evening (Sep. 23) amid objections in the city.
Larynzo Johnson, 26, was apprehended at 8: 40 p.m., according to his citation, which mentioned he would certainly face numerous costs of first-degree assault of a police officer and first-degree wanton endangerment.
LMPD acting Principal Ronert Schroeder stated Thursday that the suspect will certainly be billed with 2 counts of attack and 14 counts of wanton endangerment, “all guided versus law enforcement officer.”
Johnson is implicated of shooting two LMPD officers around 8: 30 p.m. Wednesday evening, as demonstrations continued across the city in the after-effects of the announcement that simply among the three police officers who terminated their weapons the evening Breonna Taylor was killed would certainly encounter costs.
Johnson’s apprehension citation, offered by the workplace of the Jefferson Area Circuit Notary, said the suspect’s actions “revealed an extreme indifference to the value of human life” and also put policemans at the scene at risk of death or serious injury.
The citation said LMPD officers were reacting to a big crowd at Broadway as well as Creek Street in downtown Louisville that had actually established fires and would certainly not spread after being warned.
Johnson was amongst the group and “deliberately utilized a handgun to fire numerous bullets at officers. Two police officers with LMPD were struck by the bullets causing serious physical injury.”
Witnesses determined him as firing the gun and afterwards ranging from the scene, the citation states, and he was in belongings of a handgun when he was restrained.
Footage reviewed by LMPD policemans, according to the citation, showed him shooting the tool, as well as a National Integrated Ballistic Details Network examiner was exploring an association between the firearm recuperated as well as covering housings recouped from the scene.
” There is a high chance that a tiny contrast, by a guns inspector, will confirm the organization in between the gun’s ballistic proof,” the citation from the detaining officer states.
Johnson’s document shows no previous arrests for terrible criminal activities or felony sentences. His address on the apprehension citation listed no residence address but “CAL,” meaning city at big.
One Facebook Live video taken at the time of the shooting by a person in the group shows up to show a guy in a various colored hooded sweatshirt shooting a handgun at a team of officers. A male was nabbed putting on a t shirt that appeared to match that summary.
The two police officers injured in Wednesday evening’s shooting were determined Thursday early morning as Maj. Aubrey Gregory and Robinson Desroches, an officer with LMPD’s 2nd Department that has been with the division considering that March 2019.
Gregory was struck in the hip and also was released from the medical facility overnight, LMPD acting Principal Robert Schroeder said, while Desroches undertook surgical treatment after being hit in the abdominal area. He is also anticipated to make a complete recuperation, Schroeder stated.
” Last night’s circumstance could have been so much worse for our policemans and also for individuals that were protesting when the shooting rang out,” Schroeder stated. “… We are very fortunate these 2 officers will certainly recover.”
The night before, Schroeder described the tense scenario as “extremely significant” as he talked to press reporters in a press instruction that was broken up after just minutes.
” I am extremely concerned about the safety and security of our officers,” Schroeder said. “Clearly we’ve had actually 2 officers shot this evening, and that is extremely significant. … I assume the security of our police officers as well as the neighborhood we offer is of the utmost value.”
And also to believe … every one of this could have been avoided had they jailed the police officers that killed Breonna Taylor.
Kanye West gives Kim Kardashian birthday hologram of dead father
- Report3 years ago
Benefits of Californian massage and how to do it
- Videos3 months ago
Yaya Mayweather is Allegedly Pregnant With NBA YoungBoy’s EIGHTH Baby
- Report3 years ago
Foods that accumulate fat in the hips
- Report2 years ago
MacKenzie Bezos and the Pitfalls of Tech Philanthropy
- Music2 months ago
Climbing Rap Artist Lexii Alijai Died at 21 on New Year’s Day; Superstars, Household & & Friends Shocked: “My Heart is Broken as well as the Tears Will Not Quit”
- Report5 months ago
Trump vs. Biden: Here’s what to learn about the 2020 presidential arguments
- Report9 months ago
Homer and Marge deal legal weed in a Simpsons that could have gone much worse
- Report3 months ago
Covid Christmas: Rapid tests could get students home