GM Nation? The public debate
This is the official website for the Genetic Modification (GM) public debate. Use this site to read the findings of the debate, which took place in June 2003, and to find out more about the issues surrounding GM.New Here?Live Stream
Monday – Friday 9–11am
3849 Upton Avenue Brewer, ME 04412
The Findings
The report on the findings of the debate has now been published. You can read the executive summary or download a PDF of the full report.
What was the debate?
This was the UK’s first nationwide public discussion around GM issues. Meetings were organised across the country by local authorities and network groups.
Why Debate
To help inform policy-making on GM, findings from meetings – together with views submitted by the public through this site – were fed back to the Government.
Where do I start?
Genetic Modification (GM) involves moving genetic material from the cells of one organism to those of another, be they related or unrelated.
Who can I trust?
There is so much disagreement about the benefits and risks of GM because there are so many different views surrounding it.
Get Connected
People disagree whether GM foods pose a health risk to those who eat them.
Service Times
People disagree about whether or not GM will lead to job losses in farming and other related areas.
THE NATIONAL DEBATE
At Divi Our vision and mission is to help connect people to faith
The suggestion that there should be a national debate stems from the report “Crops on Trial” published by the Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission (AEBC) in September 2001. The Commission stressed the importance of encouraging a broader national debate on the issue. The report said,
“It will be crucial for the public to be involved in the important decisions which need to be taken. We have to find a way to foster informed public discussion of the development and application of new technologies.”
Government then asked the AEBC to provide further advice on how such a debate should be managed and this Summer the Environment Secretary, Margaret Beckett announced that the debate should go ahead in parallel with two other enquiries – one to look at the science behind GM issues click here for the science review website and another to look at economic issues click here for the economics study website. The Steering Board was asked to report to Government by June 2003.
GM PULIC DEBATE Blog
The Latest News & Updates
In consenting to hear Pilot camp’s obstacle of anti-defection law, HC resumes debate thought about closed
Written by Apurva Vishwanath | New Delhi | Published: July 25, 2020 3:00:11 am The dissenting MLAs have challenged constitutional validity of Section 2(1) of the anti-defection laws, which allow the Speaker to disqualify an MLA for so-called anti-party activities. (Representational Image)The Rajasthan High Court’s decision on Friday agreeing to hear in detail the challenge…
July 25: ‘When in Canadian history has our shining democracy ever been so mistreated and badly served by government?’ Readers debate the Liberals and the WE Charity contract, plus other letters to the editor – The Globe and Mail
A skating rink is seen in the early stage of construction on the lawn of Parliament Hill, in Ottawa on Oct. 16, 2017. Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today. Where we stand Re Calls Mount To Expand Morneau Investigation (July 24): The biggest thing…
Opinion: As Congress disputes benefits of NIL expense, hardly anybody is purchasing what NCAA is selling
Dan Wolken, USA TODAY Published 6:33 p.m. ET July 22, 2020 | Updated 6:55 p.m. ET July 22, 2020CLOSE SportsPulse: While some football teams have said they will host no fans at all this fall others appear to be holding out some hope. We discuss the likely reality that football will be played this fall…