Isn’t It About Time Someone Called Time Out On Facial Recognition?

Isn’t It About Time Someone Called Time Out On Facial Recognition?

By Blair Morris

September 23, 2019

.
.

Surveillance camera with face recognition system

.
Getty.

.

San Francisco, considered by many to be the Mecca of technology, is the first US city to prevent the police and other authorities from using facial recognition technology, in what is an important step against the seemingly unstoppable roll out of this technology.

.

The city’s Board of Supervisors has concluded that the generalized assumption that people are being monitored is not psychologically healthy, and that, in addition, this technology is still too unreliable to be used for security purposes. San Francisco’s decision is just a first step, bearing in mind it doesn’t prevent private companies from continuing to use facial recognition technology, but is not surprising considering that the city is home to a large number of technology companies, making it the best prepared environment to understand its impact.

.

The widespread use of facial recognition is a moral dilemma for technology companies, which on the whole, despite opposition from their workforces, have been happy to sell their services to the highest bidder. Its key role in China or its plans for a rollout in Singapore or the United Kingdom take it beyond a mere technological question and instead into a defining characteristic of the kind of society we want to live in. Faced with the acquiescence of some, who consider this type of technology a necessary evil that we should accept despite its problems, there is growing civic pressure for careful regulation and even technology tools to try to limit its use, bearing in mind the speed of its development and the need for public debate over its application.

.

.

One thing is to make our lives more comfortable by enabling our computers, smartphones or security cameras in our homes to recognize us and use our face to unlock devices or withhold alarms, but putting an entire population under surveillance and making it possible to identify and locate anybody is a major step toward a police state where criminals may have a slightly harder time, but where everybody else is subject to and unjustifiable degree of control, in addition to a wide range of possible failures with potentially important consequences.

.

Until, as societies, we hold a discussion on the use of facial recognition and other kinds of surveillance technology so as to avoid moving inexorably toward a police state, San Francisco’s decision seems prudent and appropriate and should serve as an example for many other cities or countries contemplating its use.

.

.

“>< div _ ngcontent-c14 ="" innerhtml ="

Security cam with face acknowledgment system

Getty

San Francisco, considered by many to be the Capital of technology, isthe first US city to avoid the police and other authorities from using facial recognition technology, in what is a crucial action against the seemingly unstoppable roll out of this technology.

The city’s Board of Supervisors has actually concluded that the generalized assumption that people
are being kept an eye on is not emotionally healthy, which, in addition, this innovation is still too unreliable to be used for security purposes. San Francisco’s decision is just a primary step , bearing in mind it doesn’t prevent personal business from continuing to utilize facial recognition innovation, however is not unexpected thinking about that the city is house to a large number of technology business, making it the very best prepared environment to comprehend its effect.

The extensive usage of facial acknowledgmentis an ethical predicament for innovation business, which on the whole, regardless of opposition from their labor forces, have been pleased to offer their services to the highest bidder. Itscrucial role in China or its prepare for a rollout in Singapore or the UK take it beyond a mere technological question and instead into a specifying quality of the kind of society we wish to live in. Confronted with the acquiescence of some, who consider this kind of technology a required evil that we should accept regardless of its issues, there is growing civic pressure for careful policy and even innovation tools to try to limit its use, remembering the speed of its advancement and the requirement for public debate over its application.

.

.

Something is to make our lives more comfy by enabling our computer systems, mobile phones or security cameras in our houses to recognize us and utilize our face to unlock devices or keep alarms, but putting an entire population under monitoring and making it possible to determine and find any person is a major action toward an authorities state where criminals may have a slightly more difficult time, however where everybody else is subject to and unjustifiable degree of control, in addition to a large variety of possible failures with possibly essential effects.

Until, as societies, we hold a conversation on using facial recognition and other sort of monitoring innovation so regarding avoid moving inexorably toward an authorities state, San Francisco’s decision appears sensible and proper and should serve as an example for numerous other cities or nations pondering its use.

” >

.

.

Security camera with face recognition system

Getty.

.

San Francisco, considered by many to be the Mecca of technology, is the first US city to prevent the police and other authorities from using facial acknowledgment innovation, in what is an essential step versus the seemingly unstoppable present of this innovation.

The city’s Board of Supervisors has actually concluded that the generalized assumption that individuals are being monitored is not emotionally healthy, which, in addition, this innovation is still too unreliable to be used for security functions. San Francisco’s choice is simply an initial step , keeping in mind it does not prevent private business from continuing to utilize facial acknowledgment technology, however is not unexpected thinking about that the city is house to a large number of innovation business, making it the very best prepared environment to understand its effect.

The extensive usage of facial recognition is an ethical dilemma for technology business, which on the whole, regardless of opposition from their labor forces , have enjoyed to offer their services to the highest bidder. Its crucial function in China or its prepare for a rollout in Singapore or the United Kingdom take it beyond a simple technological concern and instead into a defining quality of the kind of society we desire to reside in. Faced with the acquiescence of some, who consider this type of technology a needed evil that we need to accept regardless of its issues , there is growing civic pressure for mindful policy and even technology tools to attempt to restrict its usage , keeping in mind the speed of its advancement and the requirement for public argument over its application.

Something is to make our lives more comfortable by allowing our computer systems, smartphones or security electronic cameras in our houses to recognize us and use our face to unlock gadgets or withhold alarms, but putting a whole population under security and making it possible to recognize and find anyone is a major step toward an authorities state where criminals may have a slightly more difficult time, but where everyone else goes through and unjustifiable degree of control, in addition to a wide variety of possible failures with potentially crucial consequences.

Till, as societies, we hold a conversation on the use of facial acknowledgment and other sort of surveillance innovation so as to prevent moving inexorably towards a police state, San Francisco’s choice appears sensible and proper and ought to act as an example for numerous other cities or countries pondering its usage.

.

Check Out More .

About Blair Morris